<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 104 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46074</link>
    <description>The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the petition related to oil rigs, ruling that areas where the rigs operate are not considered foreign territory. This decision was based on a previous Division Bench judgment in Pride Foramer v. Union of India, resulting in the denial of certain benefits under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:14:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 104 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46074</link>
      <description>The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the petition related to oil rigs, ruling that areas where the rigs operate are not considered foreign territory. This decision was based on a previous Division Bench judgment in Pride Foramer v. Union of India, resulting in the denial of certain benefits under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>