<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 142 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46061</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging a show cause notice issued by the Collector of Customs and Central Excise regarding excise duty on manufactured items. The court emphasized that factual inquiries to determine excisability should be conducted by the assessing officer based on the petitioner&#039;s response and supporting documents. The court&#039;s jurisdiction in writs is limited to specific circumstances, and the petitioner was granted the opportunity to respond to the notice within a specified timeline. The assessing officer was directed to decide on the excisability issue considering the petitioner&#039;s reply and relevant legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:45:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 142 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46061</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging a show cause notice issued by the Collector of Customs and Central Excise regarding excise duty on manufactured items. The court emphasized that factual inquiries to determine excisability should be conducted by the assessing officer based on the petitioner&#039;s response and supporting documents. The court&#039;s jurisdiction in writs is limited to specific circumstances, and the petitioner was granted the opportunity to respond to the notice within a specified timeline. The assessing officer was directed to decide on the excisability issue considering the petitioner&#039;s reply and relevant legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>