https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777153 SC held that where a statutory provision is vague or produces absurdity, courts may use interpretative tools to cure drafting defects and align the provision with the statute's spirit. The Court found that post-2002 the Act lacked adequate enforcement machinery for non-monetary final orders and that a revision filed against an execution order before the State Commission could be construed as an appeal. However, such first-appeal orders under the State Commission are not maintainable before the National Commission under the limited appeal provision; affected parties remain free to pursue appropriate legal remedies. Appeal disposed. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Aug 2025 08:41:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777153 SC held that where a statutory provision is vague or produces absurdity, courts may use interpretative tools to cure drafting defects and align the provision with the statute's spirit. The Court found that post-2002 the Act lacked adequate enforcement machinery for non-monetary final orders and that a revision filed against an execution order before the State Commission could be construed as an appeal. However, such first-appeal orders under the State Commission are not maintainable before the National Commission under the limited appeal provision; affected parties remain free to pursue appropriate legal remedies. Appeal disposed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777153