<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1351 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777163</link>
    <description>NCLAT PB, ND allowed the bank&#039;s appeal, set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s direction to reverse Rs.1,58,59,294 of margin money to the corporate debtor, and struck down the impugned order. The Tribunal held that margin money lodged as security for bank guarantees, once invoked before CIRP commenced, ceased to be the corporate debtor&#039;s asset and was properly appropriated by the bank under the facility agreement; Section 14 protections did not apply. Further, the approved resolution plan, which included the bank&#039;s claim, had attained finality and could not be reopened by the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 15:33:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1351 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777163</link>
      <description>NCLAT PB, ND allowed the bank&#039;s appeal, set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s direction to reverse Rs.1,58,59,294 of margin money to the corporate debtor, and struck down the impugned order. The Tribunal held that margin money lodged as security for bank guarantees, once invoked before CIRP commenced, ceased to be the corporate debtor&#039;s asset and was properly appropriated by the bank under the facility agreement; Section 14 protections did not apply. Further, the approved resolution plan, which included the bank&#039;s claim, had attained finality and could not be reopened by the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>