<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1368 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777180</link>
    <description>A penalty order under section 271E was found to be barred by limitation under section 275(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalty was initiated in connection with proceedings under sections 143(3) and 263, but on either basis the statutory period for passing the penalty order had already expired before the impugned order was made. The order was therefore beyond the prescribed time limit and was quashed, with the assessee succeeding on the limitation issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 08:41:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1368 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777180</link>
      <description>A penalty order under section 271E was found to be barred by limitation under section 275(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalty was initiated in connection with proceedings under sections 143(3) and 263, but on either basis the statutory period for passing the penalty order had already expired before the impugned order was made. The order was therefore beyond the prescribed time limit and was quashed, with the assessee succeeding on the limitation issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>