<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1373 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777185</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that payments to non-resident foreign attorneys/law firms were fees for professional services under s.194J and not Fees for Technical Services under s.9(1)(vii); the AO erred in treating them as FTS and taxing them under s.9. Noting the distinct statutory definitions and that s.40(a)(i)&#039;s Explanation defines only FTS, the Tribunal applied lex specialis and concluded such professional fees do not accrue or arise in India for tax under the Act. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 13:28:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1373 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777185</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that payments to non-resident foreign attorneys/law firms were fees for professional services under s.194J and not Fees for Technical Services under s.9(1)(vii); the AO erred in treating them as FTS and taxing them under s.9. Noting the distinct statutory definitions and that s.40(a)(i)&#039;s Explanation defines only FTS, the Tribunal applied lex specialis and concluded such professional fees do not accrue or arise in India for tax under the Act. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>