<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46051</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay held that duty must be paid in addition to the fine for importing diamonds without a valid license. The petitioner&#039;s plea to release the diamonds without paying duty was dismissed, emphasizing the duty amount was separate from the redemption fine. The petitioner retains the option to raise legal arguments before the relevant authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:35:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46051</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay held that duty must be paid in addition to the fine for importing diamonds without a valid license. The petitioner&#039;s plea to release the diamonds without paying duty was dismissed, emphasizing the duty amount was separate from the redemption fine. The petitioner retains the option to raise legal arguments before the relevant authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>