https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46047 A conviction under the Customs Act was upheld in revision because the prosecution case was supported by reliable evidence of customs officers who witnessed the interception and seizure, and their testimony remained unshaken. The alleged involuntary confession did not undermine the conviction since it was not the sole basis for guilt. The absence of independent witnesses was treated as immaterial on the facts, given the early-hour interception and the cogency of the prosecution evidence. The revisional court's supervisory jurisdiction was confined to correcting patent illegality or miscarriage of justice, and no such error was shown in the concurrent findings below. en-us Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:26:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46047 A conviction under the Customs Act was upheld in revision because the prosecution case was supported by reliable evidence of customs officers who witnessed the interception and seizure, and their testimony remained unshaken. The alleged involuntary confession did not undermine the conviction since it was not the sole basis for guilt. The absence of independent witnesses was treated as immaterial on the facts, given the early-hour interception and the cogency of the prosecution evidence. The revisional court's supervisory jurisdiction was confined to correcting patent illegality or miscarriage of justice, and no such error was shown in the concurrent findings below. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46047