<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 48 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46037</link>
    <description>Regulation 21(2) of the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 permits suspension of a CHA licence where immediate action is necessary and an enquiry is pending or contemplated. The Calcutta High Court stated that &quot;immediate action&quot; must be read with those accompanying conditions, and upheld suspension where the order recorded detailed prima facie reasons, including alleged misuse of the CHA stamp and the licence holder&#039;s involvement. The Court also held that such preventive suspension was not vitiated by breach of natural justice or equivalent to blacklisting, because it rested on prima facie satisfaction and not final adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:55:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 48 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46037</link>
      <description>Regulation 21(2) of the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 permits suspension of a CHA licence where immediate action is necessary and an enquiry is pending or contemplated. The Calcutta High Court stated that &quot;immediate action&quot; must be read with those accompanying conditions, and upheld suspension where the order recorded detailed prima facie reasons, including alleged misuse of the CHA stamp and the licence holder&#039;s involvement. The Court also held that such preventive suspension was not vitiated by breach of natural justice or equivalent to blacklisting, because it rested on prima facie satisfaction and not final adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>