<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1460 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463324</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI dismissed the taxpayer&#039;s plea for concessional taxation at 22% under u/s 115BAA, holding that although the taxpayer opted for the 22% rate in the ITR, it failed to upload Form 10-IC by the extended deadline (31.03.2021). Following Tribunal precedent, ITAT found no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain tax computation at the higher rate applied by CPC and rejected the taxpayer&#039;s ground of appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:41:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1460 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463324</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI dismissed the taxpayer&#039;s plea for concessional taxation at 22% under u/s 115BAA, holding that although the taxpayer opted for the 22% rate in the ITR, it failed to upload Form 10-IC by the extended deadline (31.03.2021). Following Tribunal precedent, ITAT found no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain tax computation at the higher rate applied by CPC and rejected the taxpayer&#039;s ground of appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>