<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bail under Section 439 CrPC denied in PMLA probe as Sections 24 and 45 presumptions, Sections 3 and 4 upheld</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91874</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s application for bail under Section 439 CrPC in a PMLA prosecution, finding that the petitioner failed to rebut the prima facie case and did not satisfy the statutory twin conditions of Section 45 PMLA; Section 24&#039;s presumption that proceeds of crime are involved remained unrebutted. The court observed investigative material-including bank analyses, audit reports, statements under Section 50 PMLA and seizure under Section 17-prima facie established conspiracy and offences under Sections 3 and 4 PMLA. Judicial custody and delay were held insufficient to outweigh the gravity and complexity of the alleged money-laundering offence; the bail plea was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:40:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:40:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bail under Section 439 CrPC denied in PMLA probe as Sections 24 and 45 presumptions, Sections 3 and 4 upheld</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91874</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s application for bail under Section 439 CrPC in a PMLA prosecution, finding that the petitioner failed to rebut the prima facie case and did not satisfy the statutory twin conditions of Section 45 PMLA; Section 24&#039;s presumption that proceeds of crime are involved remained unrebutted. The court observed investigative material-including bank analyses, audit reports, statements under Section 50 PMLA and seizure under Section 17-prima facie established conspiracy and offences under Sections 3 and 4 PMLA. Judicial custody and delay were held insufficient to outweigh the gravity and complexity of the alleged money-laundering offence; the bail plea was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:40:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>