https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46033 The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad rejected a petition challenging the decision of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal in New Delhi. The Court held that mere service of orders within Gujarat did not confer jurisdiction, emphasizing that the cause of action arose in Mysore. It directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate court and imposed costs of Rs. 5,000. The Court underscored the importance of leaving classification matters to authorities with jurisdiction and filing writ petitions at the place of relevant offices and records to avoid delays, citing a Supreme Court decision. en-us Mon, 28 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:53:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46033 The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad rejected a petition challenging the decision of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal in New Delhi. The Court held that mere service of orders within Gujarat did not confer jurisdiction, emphasizing that the cause of action arose in Mysore. It directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate court and imposed costs of Rs. 5,000. The Court underscored the importance of leaving classification matters to authorities with jurisdiction and filing writ petitions at the place of relevant offices and records to avoid delays, citing a Supreme Court decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46033