https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777114 The insolvency framework was treated as wide enough to permit the Adjudicating Authority to entertain enforcement of an arbitral award in aid of corporate insolvency resolution, and the award's finality supported its consideration despite arbitration-law objections. Insufficient stamp duty was treated as a curable defect that did not render the award void or unenforceable in insolvency proceedings. The 90-day timeframe under the MSME framework was held to be directory, so delay beyond that period did not by itself make the award a nullity. On these principles, the challenge failed and the award remained capable of being pursued in insolvency. en-us Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Aug 2025 13:44:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777114 The insolvency framework was treated as wide enough to permit the Adjudicating Authority to entertain enforcement of an arbitral award in aid of corporate insolvency resolution, and the award's finality supported its consideration despite arbitration-law objections. Insufficient stamp duty was treated as a curable defect that did not render the award void or unenforceable in insolvency proceedings. The 90-day timeframe under the MSME framework was held to be directory, so delay beyond that period did not by itself make the award a nullity. On these principles, the challenge failed and the award remained capable of being pursued in insolvency. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777114