https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777121 ITAT (Hyderabad) allowed the appeal, deleting additions under s.69A r.w.s.115BBE. The tribunal found transaction reports and reconciliations showed the assessee's bank account was used for receipts from both the assessee's and her husband's Mee Seva business; cash deposits funded payments to APT (assessee's business) and PayU (husband's business). On this basis the tribunal accepted the source of deposits as explained and set aside the assessment addition sustained by the CIT(A). en-us Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:40:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777121 ITAT (Hyderabad) allowed the appeal, deleting additions under s.69A r.w.s.115BBE. The tribunal found transaction reports and reconciliations showed the assessee's bank account was used for receipts from both the assessee's and her husband's Mee Seva business; cash deposits funded payments to APT (assessee's business) and PayU (husband's business). On this basis the tribunal accepted the source of deposits as explained and set aside the assessment addition sustained by the CIT(A). Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777121