<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1681 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463323</link>
    <description>An ex parte appellate order was recalled because the assessee&#039;s non-appearance through counsel was explained by serious illness of the authorised representative and a stated adjournment request. The absence was treated as bona fide rather than deliberate default, and restoration was considered appropriate so the dispute could be heard on merits. The matter was therefore directed to be listed for fresh hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 19:54:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1681 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463323</link>
      <description>An ex parte appellate order was recalled because the assessee&#039;s non-appearance through counsel was explained by serious illness of the authorised representative and a stated adjournment request. The absence was treated as bona fide rather than deliberate default, and restoration was considered appropriate so the dispute could be heard on merits. The matter was therefore directed to be listed for fresh hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>