<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Addition under s.69 deleted as assessee&#039;s 50% share largely explained; remaining cash linked to disclosed dairy income</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91845</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleted the additions under s. 69. The Tribunal held that the impugned property&#039;s total purchase consideration was Rs. 45,47,701, of which the assessee, as 50% co-owner, only bore Rs. 22,73,850. The assessee satisfactorily explained Rs. 22,00,000 of that share; the remaining Rs. 73,850 was plausibly attributable to cash-in-hand disclosed in the return relating to dairy income and could have been called for explanation by the AO. The AO&#039;s blanket addition of the entire investment was therefore found unjustified and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Addition under s.69 deleted as assessee&#039;s 50% share largely explained; remaining cash linked to disclosed dairy income</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91845</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleted the additions under s. 69. The Tribunal held that the impugned property&#039;s total purchase consideration was Rs. 45,47,701, of which the assessee, as 50% co-owner, only bore Rs. 22,73,850. The assessee satisfactorily explained Rs. 22,00,000 of that share; the remaining Rs. 73,850 was plausibly attributable to cash-in-hand disclosed in the return relating to dairy income and could have been called for explanation by the AO. The AO&#039;s blanket addition of the entire investment was therefore found unjustified and set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>