<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 79 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46016</link>
    <description>Fiscal exemption and amnesty benefits under Notification No. 203/92 depended on strict compliance with prescribed conditions. A prior reversal of Modvat credit made before the scheme began was not, by itself, disqualifying, but the benefit was unavailable because interest was not deposited within the stipulated time and no relaxation or extension was permitted. A further plea that inputs used in exempted exports could not be segregated was rejected because it was not raised before the lower authorities and could not be introduced at the appellate stage to defeat the notification conditions. The duty demand was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 79 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46016</link>
      <description>Fiscal exemption and amnesty benefits under Notification No. 203/92 depended on strict compliance with prescribed conditions. A prior reversal of Modvat credit made before the scheme began was not, by itself, disqualifying, but the benefit was unavailable because interest was not deposited within the stipulated time and no relaxation or extension was permitted. A further plea that inputs used in exempted exports could not be segregated was rejected because it was not raised before the lower authorities and could not be introduced at the appellate stage to defeat the notification conditions. The duty demand was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>