<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Approved resolution plan excludes gratuity claims; Annexure 7 records &quot;Nil Payment&quot; for certain claimants, review rejected</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91837</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed the review applications and upheld the approved resolution plan, holding that the Applicants&#039; gratuity claims did not form part of the plan. Annexure 7 to the plan expressly recorded &quot;Nil Payment&quot; for specified claimants not on the Corporate Debtor&#039;s payroll as on 06.02.2018, including one Applicant, and that Annexure could not be severed or read in isolation. The SRA had implemented payments pursuant to the plan, having discharged a portion of gratuity liabilities. Because the plan, approved by the CoC and adjudicating authority, excluded these claims and had attained finality, the Applicants were precluded from reopening them; no grounds for review existed and the applications were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Approved resolution plan excludes gratuity claims; Annexure 7 records &quot;Nil Payment&quot; for certain claimants, review rejected</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91837</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed the review applications and upheld the approved resolution plan, holding that the Applicants&#039; gratuity claims did not form part of the plan. Annexure 7 to the plan expressly recorded &quot;Nil Payment&quot; for specified claimants not on the Corporate Debtor&#039;s payroll as on 06.02.2018, including one Applicant, and that Annexure could not be severed or read in isolation. The SRA had implemented payments pursuant to the plan, having discharged a portion of gratuity liabilities. Because the plan, approved by the CoC and adjudicating authority, excluded these claims and had attained finality, the Applicants were precluded from reopening them; no grounds for review existed and the applications were rejected.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>