<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 7 IBC admission vacated after creditor status, unlawful assignment, unauthorized OTS claim and attempted possession found unsustainable</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91836</link>
    <description>NCLAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned admission order under Section 7 of the IBC. The Tribunal held the Section 7 petition unsustainable because the respondent failed to establish status as a financial creditor; the purported assignment by the co-operative bank was unlawful and was withdrawn, and the AA erred in admitting the CIRP application without considering the co-operative bank&#039;s pending application and averments. The Tribunal found the respondent&#039;s OTS-based claim and attempted possession to be unauthorized, thereby extinguishing the basis for the claim. Consequentially, the Section 7 application was dismissed and the admission vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 7 IBC admission vacated after creditor status, unlawful assignment, unauthorized OTS claim and attempted possession found unsustainable</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91836</link>
      <description>NCLAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned admission order under Section 7 of the IBC. The Tribunal held the Section 7 petition unsustainable because the respondent failed to establish status as a financial creditor; the purported assignment by the co-operative bank was unlawful and was withdrawn, and the AA erred in admitting the CIRP application without considering the co-operative bank&#039;s pending application and averments. The Tribunal found the respondent&#039;s OTS-based claim and attempted possession to be unauthorized, thereby extinguishing the basis for the claim. Consequentially, the Section 7 application was dismissed and the admission vacated.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>