<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1217 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777029</link>
    <description>A loan transaction does not by itself constitute criminal breach of trust unless entrustment and dishonest misappropriation or conversion are clearly shown. The advance here was a business loan, repayments had been serviced for a substantial period, and the record did not disclose dishonest misappropriation of the borrowed money; the ingredients of Section 405 IPC were therefore not made out. In a commercial dispute, a preliminary inquiry before FIR registration is permissible, and an inquiry had already concluded that no cognizable offence was disclosed. As the matter was predominantly civil in nature, directing registration of an FIR was unwarranted and the order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1217 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777029</link>
      <description>A loan transaction does not by itself constitute criminal breach of trust unless entrustment and dishonest misappropriation or conversion are clearly shown. The advance here was a business loan, repayments had been serviced for a substantial period, and the record did not disclose dishonest misappropriation of the borrowed money; the ingredients of Section 405 IPC were therefore not made out. In a commercial dispute, a preliminary inquiry before FIR registration is permissible, and an inquiry had already concluded that no cognizable offence was disclosed. As the matter was predominantly civil in nature, directing registration of an FIR was unwarranted and the order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>