https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46012 Non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act justified the Tribunal's refusal to entertain the appeal, and the High Court found no reason to interfere with that course. The petitioner had already been given time to deposit the directed amount but did not comply. However, in the interest of justice, the Court granted a further four weeks to make the deposit and permitted the petitioner to seek restoration of the appeal on proof of compliance. en-us Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:05:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46012 Non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act justified the Tribunal's refusal to entertain the appeal, and the High Court found no reason to interfere with that course. The petitioner had already been given time to deposit the directed amount but did not comply. However, in the interest of justice, the Court granted a further four weeks to make the deposit and permitted the petitioner to seek restoration of the appeal on proof of compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46012