<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1256 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777068</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271AAC(1) was held unsustainable where cash deposits were assessed as unexplained income under section 69A read with section 115BBE, because the assessee consistently explained that the deposits were business receipts made during the demonetisation period. That explanation was treated as reasonable cause for the deposits in the circumstances, despite the addition itself being sustained. The penalty was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1256 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777068</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271AAC(1) was held unsustainable where cash deposits were assessed as unexplained income under section 69A read with section 115BBE, because the assessee consistently explained that the deposits were business receipts made during the demonetisation period. That explanation was treated as reasonable cause for the deposits in the circumstances, despite the addition itself being sustained. The penalty was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>