<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46008</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application, affirming that Section 111(m) of the Customs Act applies broadly to any goods that do not correspond in respect of value or other particulars with the entry made under the Act, and is not limited to dutiable goods. The court found the lower courts acted within their jurisdiction and upheld the penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46008</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application, affirming that Section 111(m) of the Customs Act applies broadly to any goods that do not correspond in respect of value or other particulars with the entry made under the Act, and is not limited to dutiable goods. The court found the lower courts acted within their jurisdiction and upheld the penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>