<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1293 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777105</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the review petition challenging HC&#039;s direction to release seized currency and other valuables taken during a search under section 67 of the GST Act, including two silver bars and mobile phones. The Court held the jurisdictional and statutory interpretation issues concerning the proper officer&#039;s power to seize unaccounted assets did not warrant interference under Article 136. No case for review was made out, and the review petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1293 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777105</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the review petition challenging HC&#039;s direction to release seized currency and other valuables taken during a search under section 67 of the GST Act, including two silver bars and mobile phones. The Court held the jurisdictional and statutory interpretation issues concerning the proper officer&#039;s power to seize unaccounted assets did not warrant interference under Article 136. No case for review was made out, and the review petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>