https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463294 CESTAT (AT) New Delhi allowed the rectification application, finding a mistake apparent on the face of the record due to non-consideration of a coordinate bench decision filed after hearing. The Tribunal held that omission to consider a jurisdictional court decision constitutes an apparent error requiring reconsideration. The order dated 10.02.2025 is set aside for reconsideration, directing the Tribunal to take into account the previously unconsidered bench decisions relied upon by the appellant. en-us Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Aug 2025 20:06:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463294 CESTAT (AT) New Delhi allowed the rectification application, finding a mistake apparent on the face of the record due to non-consideration of a coordinate bench decision filed after hearing. The Tribunal held that omission to consider a jurisdictional court decision constitutes an apparent error requiring reconsideration. The order dated 10.02.2025 is set aside for reconsideration, directing the Tribunal to take into account the previously unconsidered bench decisions relied upon by the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463294