<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1237 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463306</link>
    <description>ITAT PUNE - AT held that reopening under s.147 and addition under s.68 based solely on an Investigation Wing report accessed via the Insight portal, without independent application of mind by the Assessing Officer, amounted to borrowed satisfaction and was void ab initio. Because the reassessment stemmed from that non-independent basis, the proceedings were not in accordance with law and were quashed; the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 20:06:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1237 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463306</link>
      <description>ITAT PUNE - AT held that reopening under s.147 and addition under s.68 based solely on an Investigation Wing report accessed via the Insight portal, without independent application of mind by the Assessing Officer, amounted to borrowed satisfaction and was void ab initio. Because the reassessment stemmed from that non-independent basis, the proceedings were not in accordance with law and were quashed; the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>