<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463307</link>
    <description>ITAT, MUMBAI allowed the appeal and directed CIT(E) to treat the delayed Form 10AB as filed on time despite a 23-day delay, permitting regularisation of provisional registration under section 12AB. The tribunal applied a liberal approach to condoning the technical delay, noting a Board circular intended to extend the filing opportunity, and ordered the CIT(E) to decide the application on merits and in accordance with law. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 20:06:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463307</link>
      <description>ITAT, MUMBAI allowed the appeal and directed CIT(E) to treat the delayed Form 10AB as filed on time despite a 23-day delay, permitting regularisation of provisional registration under section 12AB. The tribunal applied a liberal approach to condoning the technical delay, noting a Board circular intended to extend the filing opportunity, and ordered the CIT(E) to decide the application on merits and in accordance with law. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>