<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 90 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46002</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal concerning excise duty on nylon yarn, upholding the earlier order directing payment of only the principal amount deposited by the respondent, not the interest. The Court found the appellant&#039;s claim for interest lacked merit as per the final order of the Single Judge in the Bombay High Court. The appeal was dismissed with costs, emphasizing adherence to the previous ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 90 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46002</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal concerning excise duty on nylon yarn, upholding the earlier order directing payment of only the principal amount deposited by the respondent, not the interest. The Court found the appellant&#039;s claim for interest lacked merit as per the final order of the Single Judge in the Bombay High Court. The appeal was dismissed with costs, emphasizing adherence to the previous ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>