<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 128 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45992</link>
    <description>The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the petition as there was no fixed limitation period for taking credit, and the credit taken beyond six months was deemed valid. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:13:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 128 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45992</link>
      <description>The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the petition as there was no fixed limitation period for taking credit, and the credit taken beyond six months was deemed valid. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>