<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45991</link>
    <description>Regulation 12(2) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 was treated as conferring discretionary power to renew a licence where performance is satisfactory against the prescribed norms. The public notice norms were not read as an absolute bar to renewal in every case of shortfall. If the deficiency arose from circumstances beyond the licensee&#039;s control and the explanation was accepted, the authority was expected to consider renewal on its merits and not refuse it on a purely technical basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:11:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 93 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45991</link>
      <description>Regulation 12(2) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 was treated as conferring discretionary power to renew a licence where performance is satisfactory against the prescribed norms. The public notice norms were not read as an absolute bar to renewal in every case of shortfall. If the deficiency arose from circumstances beyond the licensee&#039;s control and the explanation was accepted, the authority was expected to consider renewal on its merits and not refuse it on a purely technical basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>