<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Issuance of SCN in undue haste, without reasonable time to respond to audit queries and DRC-01A intimation, violates principles of natural justice</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14987</link>
    <description>Issuance of a show-cause notice in undue haste, without affording adequate time to answer audit queries and the Form DRC-01A intimation, breaches the principles of natural justice. One-day timelines for response were manifestly inadequate; the petitioner&#039;s written request for extension was ignored and a Form DRC-01 was issued shortly thereafter, suggesting action taken to protect limitation rather than enable fair adjudication. The process prima facie denied a reasonable opportunity to be heard, and the court recorded that no coercive action should be taken during the petition&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:36:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:36:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Issuance of SCN in undue haste, without reasonable time to respond to audit queries and DRC-01A intimation, violates principles of natural justice</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14987</link>
      <description>Issuance of a show-cause notice in undue haste, without affording adequate time to answer audit queries and the Form DRC-01A intimation, breaches the principles of natural justice. One-day timelines for response were manifestly inadequate; the petitioner&#039;s written request for extension was ignored and a Form DRC-01 was issued shortly thereafter, suggesting action taken to protect limitation rather than enable fair adjudication. The process prima facie denied a reasonable opportunity to be heard, and the court recorded that no coercive action should be taken during the petition&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:36:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>