<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 2066 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463283</link>
    <description>Customs valuation cannot be enhanced unless the declared transaction value is first rejected on cogent evidence. In the absence of such rejection, an upward revision under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 is not sustainable. Reliance on NIDB data alone was held insufficient because that data was treated as unreliable for fixing a higher import value. The enhancement was therefore set aside, and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:36:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 2066 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463283</link>
      <description>Customs valuation cannot be enhanced unless the declared transaction value is first rejected on cogent evidence. In the absence of such rejection, an upward revision under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 is not sustainable. Reliance on NIDB data alone was held insufficient because that data was treated as unreliable for fixing a higher import value. The enhancement was therefore set aside, and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>