<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1292 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463289</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition, upholding HC&#039;s view that reassessment initiated under s.147 was invalid where the reasons to believe relied solely on material already disclosed during the original assessment. The court accepted that no fresh material or new facts were placed before the assessing authority and the reasons recorded merely referenced information furnished earlier by the taxpayer; accordingly, reopening the assessment lacked jurisdiction and was not permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:36:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1292 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463289</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition, upholding HC&#039;s view that reassessment initiated under s.147 was invalid where the reasons to believe relied solely on material already disclosed during the original assessment. The court accepted that no fresh material or new facts were placed before the assessing authority and the reasons recorded merely referenced information furnished earlier by the taxpayer; accordingly, reopening the assessment lacked jurisdiction and was not permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>