<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1213 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777025</link>
    <description>The HC held the writ petition not maintainable as the dispute concerned a private quarrel between the petitioner and his two lawyers over release of gold bars. The court treated the matter as a private dispute to be resolved outside court, appointed a mediator from the Bar, fixed mediator&#039;s fee at Rs.100,000 to be borne equally by the petitioner and one lawyer, and directed mediation. If mediation fails, parties may pursue available legal remedies. Petition dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:35:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1213 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777025</link>
      <description>The HC held the writ petition not maintainable as the dispute concerned a private quarrel between the petitioner and his two lawyers over release of gold bars. The court treated the matter as a private dispute to be resolved outside court, appointed a mediator from the Bar, fixed mediator&#039;s fee at Rs.100,000 to be borne equally by the petitioner and one lawyer, and directed mediation. If mediation fails, parties may pursue available legal remedies. Petition dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>