<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1215 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777027</link>
    <description>HC held that the impugned order dated 20 March 2025 violated principles of natural justice because the rectification application was rejected without affording a hearing. The order was set aside and the rectification application must be adjudicated afresh by the Adjudicating Authority after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. Petition disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:35:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1215 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777027</link>
      <description>HC held that the impugned order dated 20 March 2025 violated principles of natural justice because the rectification application was rejected without affording a hearing. The order was set aside and the rectification application must be adjudicated afresh by the Adjudicating Authority after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. Petition disposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>