<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petition challenging reassessment under s.147/148 (explanation 1) dismissed; merger effective only on sanction 13.11.2020, taxpayer distinct.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91807</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petition challenging reopening under s.147/148, holding the reopening valid because the scheme of merger became effective only upon NCLT sanction on 13.11.2020; until then the petitioner remained a distinct legal entity with an active PAN and conducted financial transactions in AY 2020-21. The CBDT Risk Management Strategy report identified transactions totaling Rs. 11,64,12,993 which, under explanation 1 to s.148, escaped assessment. The Court found the transferee&#039;s return was accepted as nil after scrutiny, but the petitioner continued business during the merger process; consequently the petitioner&#039;s contention of cessation from 01.04.2018 was rejected and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:33:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:33:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petition challenging reassessment under s.147/148 (explanation 1) dismissed; merger effective only on sanction 13.11.2020, taxpayer distinct.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91807</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petition challenging reopening under s.147/148, holding the reopening valid because the scheme of merger became effective only upon NCLT sanction on 13.11.2020; until then the petitioner remained a distinct legal entity with an active PAN and conducted financial transactions in AY 2020-21. The CBDT Risk Management Strategy report identified transactions totaling Rs. 11,64,12,993 which, under explanation 1 to s.148, escaped assessment. The Court found the transferee&#039;s return was accepted as nil after scrutiny, but the petitioner continued business during the merger process; consequently the petitioner&#039;s contention of cessation from 01.04.2018 was rejected and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:33:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>