<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1146 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776958</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, finding a gross unexplained delay of 151 days and no sufficient reasons to admit it. The Court declined to interfere with the impugned CESTAT order of 23-12-2024, which had set aside demands for alleged service tax on site-formation services (June 2005-May 2007) and for alleged short payment/undervaluation under mining service (June 2007-Sept 2008). The appeal was dismissed both on grounds of delay and on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:33:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1146 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776958</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, finding a gross unexplained delay of 151 days and no sufficient reasons to admit it. The Court declined to interfere with the impugned CESTAT order of 23-12-2024, which had set aside demands for alleged service tax on site-formation services (June 2005-May 2007) and for alleged short payment/undervaluation under mining service (June 2007-Sept 2008). The appeal was dismissed both on grounds of delay and on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>