<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1175 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776987</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT remitted the issue to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for de novo consideration on whether the Industrial Promotional Subsidy (Chakan) constitutes a capital receipt within the amended definition of income under section 2(24)(viii) (effective AY 2016-17), noting that earlier adjudication did not fully address the amended provision and relevant documents were lacking. The assessee&#039;s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:33:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1175 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776987</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT remitted the issue to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for de novo consideration on whether the Industrial Promotional Subsidy (Chakan) constitutes a capital receipt within the amended definition of income under section 2(24)(viii) (effective AY 2016-17), noting that earlier adjudication did not fully address the amended provision and relevant documents were lacking. The assessee&#039;s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>