<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1179 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776991</link>
    <description>ITAT held the reopening under s.147 invalid, finding the AO&#039;s &quot;reasons to believe&quot; were based on material already supplied by the assessee during the original s.143(3) assessment and therefore amounted to a mere change of opinion. As no fresh material or facts supported reopening and pre-conditions of the first proviso to s.147 were not met, the reassessment was quashed and decision rendered for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:33:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1179 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776991</link>
      <description>ITAT held the reopening under s.147 invalid, finding the AO&#039;s &quot;reasons to believe&quot; were based on material already supplied by the assessee during the original s.143(3) assessment and therefore amounted to a mere change of opinion. As no fresh material or facts supported reopening and pre-conditions of the first proviso to s.147 were not met, the reassessment was quashed and decision rendered for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>