<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45975</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the Customs Authority to release the DEPB Licences and bank guarantee immediately. It held that the Circular lacked statutory force and could not override legislative provisions. The Customs Authority&#039;s actions were found to violate the petitioner&#039;s rights under the Constitution of India. The court emphasized the need for administrative actions to adhere to statutory provisions and constitutional mandates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:15:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45975</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the Customs Authority to release the DEPB Licences and bank guarantee immediately. It held that the Circular lacked statutory force and could not override legislative provisions. The Customs Authority&#039;s actions were found to violate the petitioner&#039;s rights under the Constitution of India. The court emphasized the need for administrative actions to adhere to statutory provisions and constitutional mandates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>