<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1061 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776873</link>
    <description>HC held that an assessee is entitled to refund of CENVAT credit even where the impugned services/export of software were not defined as taxable service under the CENVAT Credit Rules/Section 3(1). Relying on prior HC precedents, the court found the controversy settled against the revenue and answered the substantial question of law in favour of the assessee. Both appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1061 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776873</link>
      <description>HC held that an assessee is entitled to refund of CENVAT credit even where the impugned services/export of software were not defined as taxable service under the CENVAT Credit Rules/Section 3(1). Relying on prior HC precedents, the court found the controversy settled against the revenue and answered the substantial question of law in favour of the assessee. Both appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>