<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 56 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45957</link>
    <description>A deemed-export supply under the Export and Import Policy entitled an advance intermediate licence holder to refund of terminal excise duty, because the policy conferred a substantive benefit that could not be curtailed by the absence of a matching procedure in the Handbook of Procedures. The availability of an exemption route under the Central Excise Rules did not defeat the policy-based refund claim where the authority had earlier refused to treat the goods as intermediate goods. The Court also accepted entitlement to interest on the refunded amount, but rejected 24% per annum for lack of legal basis and fixed interest at 12% per annum from the date of the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 13:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 56 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45957</link>
      <description>A deemed-export supply under the Export and Import Policy entitled an advance intermediate licence holder to refund of terminal excise duty, because the policy conferred a substantive benefit that could not be curtailed by the absence of a matching procedure in the Handbook of Procedures. The availability of an exemption route under the Central Excise Rules did not defeat the policy-based refund claim where the authority had earlier refused to treat the goods as intermediate goods. The Court also accepted entitlement to interest on the refunded amount, but rejected 24% per annum for lack of legal basis and fixed interest at 12% per annum from the date of the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>