<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1076 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776888</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, upholding NCLAT&#039;s finding that the company petition filed by Respondent No. 1 (the financial corporate respondent) before the Adjudicating Authority was within the limitation period and not time-barred. The Court found no merit or grounds to interfere with the impugned NCLAT order and therefore affirmed the adjudicatory conclusion that the petition was timely, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:35:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1076 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776888</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, upholding NCLAT&#039;s finding that the company petition filed by Respondent No. 1 (the financial corporate respondent) before the Adjudicating Authority was within the limitation period and not time-barred. The Court found no merit or grounds to interfere with the impugned NCLAT order and therefore affirmed the adjudicatory conclusion that the petition was timely, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>