<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1089 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776901</link>
    <description>ITAT, Nagpur affirmed that levy of late filing fee under section 234E for delayed TDS statements is consequential and mandatory where statements were furnished after the due date under s.200(3). Although s.234E was effective from 1 July 2012, the enabling provision s.200A(1)(c) came into force w.e.f. 1 June 2015; the AO&#039;s imposition of the fee was upheld by CIT(A) and the Tribunal declined to delete the levy. Appeal by the assessee dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:02:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1089 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776901</link>
      <description>ITAT, Nagpur affirmed that levy of late filing fee under section 234E for delayed TDS statements is consequential and mandatory where statements were furnished after the due date under s.200(3). Although s.234E was effective from 1 July 2012, the enabling provision s.200A(1)(c) came into force w.e.f. 1 June 2015; the AO&#039;s imposition of the fee was upheld by CIT(A) and the Tribunal declined to delete the levy. Appeal by the assessee dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>