<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1100 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776912</link>
    <description>ITAT held that for a company the &quot;substantial interest&quot; under section 2(22)(e) must be tested at year-end, not at any time during the year. Explanation 3(b) applies to concerns other than companies, so intra-year shareholding reductions do not attract deemed dividend for companies. As the assessee&#039;s year-end holding fell below 10%, the loan from the company could not be treated as deemed dividend and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:35:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1100 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776912</link>
      <description>ITAT held that for a company the &quot;substantial interest&quot; under section 2(22)(e) must be tested at year-end, not at any time during the year. Explanation 3(b) applies to concerns other than companies, so intra-year shareholding reductions do not attract deemed dividend for companies. As the assessee&#039;s year-end holding fell below 10%, the loan from the company could not be treated as deemed dividend and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>