https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776919 ITAT (Jaipur) allowed the appeal, finding a bona fide typographical error: salary was wrongly reported as Rs. 31,06,910 instead of Rs. 3,10,691. The AO accepted the assessee's submissions and supporting Form 16 and bank records, but rectification under s.154 was not effected earlier due to an internal communication gap between the Department and CPC. The Tribunal directed the AO to correct records to reflect the actual salary and deposits and allowed the appeal. en-us Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Aug 2025 16:59:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776919 ITAT (Jaipur) allowed the appeal, finding a bona fide typographical error: salary was wrongly reported as Rs. 31,06,910 instead of Rs. 3,10,691. The AO accepted the assessee's submissions and supporting Form 16 and bank records, but rectification under s.154 was not effected earlier due to an internal communication gap between the Department and CPC. The Tribunal directed the AO to correct records to reflect the actual salary and deposits and allowed the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776919