<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1109 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776921</link>
    <description>Audited books, stock records, cash book, VAT returns and sales registers supported the assessee&#039;s cash sales, and no specific defect was found in purchases, inventory, accounting method or quantitative records. Rejection of books and treatment of sales as bogus on the basis of suspicion, abnormal cash pattern, or absence of PAN and address of cash buyers was held unsustainable. Cash deposits in demonetized currency, being traceable to recorded sale proceeds, could not be taxed again as unexplained cash credit or unexplained money under sections 68 or 69A, and the consequential levy under section 115BBE also failed. The addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:35:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1109 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776921</link>
      <description>Audited books, stock records, cash book, VAT returns and sales registers supported the assessee&#039;s cash sales, and no specific defect was found in purchases, inventory, accounting method or quantitative records. Rejection of books and treatment of sales as bogus on the basis of suspicion, abnormal cash pattern, or absence of PAN and address of cash buyers was held unsustainable. Cash deposits in demonetized currency, being traceable to recorded sale proceeds, could not be taxed again as unexplained cash credit or unexplained money under sections 68 or 69A, and the consequential levy under section 115BBE also failed. The addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>