https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776936 Karnataka HC allowed the petition, holding the notice/endorsement and impugned order to be cryptic, laconic and non-speaking, violative of natural justice and contrary to binding precedents. The HC set aside the impugned order and notice and directed immediate unblocking of the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger, while permitting respondents to issue a fresh notice. The court ruled availability of an appeal does not bar Art.226 jurisdiction where orders are unreasoned, and balanced equities by requiring the petitioner to maintain a minimum 10% of the tax demand in the Electronic Credit Ledger. en-us Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:35:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776936 Karnataka HC allowed the petition, holding the notice/endorsement and impugned order to be cryptic, laconic and non-speaking, violative of natural justice and contrary to binding precedents. The HC set aside the impugned order and notice and directed immediate unblocking of the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger, while permitting respondents to issue a fresh notice. The court ruled availability of an appeal does not bar Art.226 jurisdiction where orders are unreasoned, and balanced equities by requiring the petitioner to maintain a minimum 10% of the tax demand in the Electronic Credit Ledger. Case-Laws GST Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776936