<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1128 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776940</link>
    <description>HC held writ petition not maintainable where statutory appeal under s.107 of the GST Act is available. Although cancellation of the firm&#039;s GST registration involved failure to receive a manual notice and a breach of natural justice, the court disposed the petition and directed the petitioner to pursue the remedy by filing the statutory appeal before the appropriate authority. Petition dismissed on that ground, leaving the appellate remedy open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:35:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1128 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776940</link>
      <description>HC held writ petition not maintainable where statutory appeal under s.107 of the GST Act is available. Although cancellation of the firm&#039;s GST registration involved failure to receive a manual notice and a breach of natural justice, the court disposed the petition and directed the petitioner to pursue the remedy by filing the statutory appeal before the appropriate authority. Petition dismissed on that ground, leaving the appellate remedy open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>