https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463264 The HC held the matter was covered by its earlier decision and that the Tribunal's exercise of discretion to refer the factual nexus for further examination was not perverse. Finding the facts indistinguishable from the precedent, the Court found no substantial question of law arising and declined to interfere with the Tribunal's approach. Consequently, the refund claim challenge was dismissed and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Aug 2025 10:30:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463264 The HC held the matter was covered by its earlier decision and that the Tribunal's exercise of discretion to refer the factual nexus for further examination was not perverse. Finding the facts indistinguishable from the precedent, the Court found no substantial question of law arising and declined to interfere with the Tribunal's approach. Consequently, the refund claim challenge was dismissed and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463264